Water Torture Makes Great Exhibition of Itself
Wrightstyle Limited is one of the UK’s leading suppliers of integrated steel and glass systems with an international client base. Simon Bennett, the company’s international sales director, explains the origins of the notoriously difficult US fire testing regime, and why the company decided they had to pass it.
Mention water torture and most people think of the Chinese. This is hardly fair, as there is no evidence whatsoever that the Chinese practised this most nefarious of dark arts. The term was first used by the world’s first celebrity escapologist Harry Houdini, who in 1913 performed an act in which he was tied up and suspended upside-down in a locked glass and steel cabinet that was filled with water.
The term was then popularised by the Fu Manchu stories of Sax Rohmer that were popular in the 1930s, in which the evil Fu Manchu subjected his victims to various ingenious tortures, only some of which involved water.
However, the origin of the phrase actually belongs to Hippolytus de Marsiliis, a 16th century Italian lawyer at the time of the Papal Inquisition. He observed how drops of water falling on a stone gradually created a hollow and, being a lawyer, realised that this could be used as a form of human torture. Victims were strapped down so that they could not move, and cold water was then dripped slowly onto their forehead. The victim could see each drop coming, and was gradually driven mad.
That same form of torture is still being practiced to test the integrity of glazing systems in the United States. Nowadays, it’s called the hose stream test, and it has probably driven numerous glazing specialists completely insane. The test, controversial and challenging, is notoriously difficult.
American test methodology requires, as in Europe and elsewhere, that the glazing system is subjected to furnace temperatures of over 1750°F, testing the strength of the glass, the integrity of the glazing system, and its overall capability to maintain compartmentation in a fire situation.
However, immediately after fire exposure, the American testing standard also requires the glazing system to then be subjected to a high-pressure fire-hose test, aimed directly onto the super-heated steel and glass assembly, and generating a water stream in the region of 30 psi.
In the hose stream test, the longer the fire resistance being applied for, then the longer and more severe is the high-pressure water exposure. This tests the glass for the thermal shock of being deluged and suddenly cooled by the fire fighting services, as well as by the building’s own sprinkler system.
Like many test regimes, the hose stream test has its roots in a bygone age, and wasn’t even originally designed to test the glass. So bygone an age, in fact, that Queen Victoria was still on the English throne, the sun hadn’t yet sunk on the British Empire – and architecture was undergoing one of its periodic and seismic upheavals.
The reason for this sea change in architectural practice was glass – or rather, the glazing system to hold the glass in place. Until the early to mid-18th century, large expanses of glass had only had a limited place in the architectural lexicon. It was expensive and therefore mostly only used in mansion houses, churches or public buildings.
It was a British architect Joseph Paxton who changed everything. Until the mid-1800s, Paxton was best known for designing greenhouses for the British nobility. Plants were being brought back to Britain from all parts of the Empire, and having a bigger and better greenhouse was én vogue.
So much so that, when the idea for the Great Exhibition came along, it was Joseph Paxton who was selected to design the main exhibition area. In taking on the project, Paxton simply drew from his horticultural experience and, using vast amounts of load-bearing ironwork, designed a structure that contained over 300,000 panels of glass to a total of more than one million square feet.
Joseph Paxton’s experience in garden design served him well because, simply by scaling up his earlier work, design to completion took just seven months. The result was a giant greenhouse: an entire, huge building made entirely of wrought iron and glass.
The finished building was, of course, a wonder of its day. The public, and not a few architects, flocked to it from all over the world. In total, over six million of them – not bad for an age without budget airlines or the motorcar!
Inside its great halls were some 13,000 exhibits, and the money it generated allowed the government to build other great symbols of Empire, including the Albert Hall and the Victoria and Albert Museum.
A number of architects that saw the Great Exhibition were from America, and they took the concepts they’d seen back to the United States. The balance between form and function was being rewritten: iron and, later, steel now allowed the architect to think about building design in new ways. Thus, the modern skyscraper was born.
The hose stream test, first introduced in 1918, wasnt designed with glass in mind. It was designed to test the integrity of the cast and wrought ironwork that had been popularised by the Great Exhibition. With the glazing industry in its infancy, there was little understanding of the critical importance of compatibility between frame and glass. The result was that the iron frame often failed – putting fire-fighters and a building’s occupants at risk.
The hose stream test, once also a UK requirement, went out of fashion as iron was replaced with steel – a material immensely stronger and more resilient than the iron it replaced. It has, however, been retained in the USA for all fire-rated constructions seeking accreditation for more than one hour of integrity – despite growing calls for it to be abandoned as an anachronism.
At Wrightstyle, we have always sought to be at the forefront of fire, ballistic and blast safety and, with architectural specifications becoming increasing global, we felt it appropriate to have our glazing systems tested under US specifications. We now export our curtain walling, door, screen and window systems worldwide, so it seemed sensible to add US fire test compliance to the other international test certifications that we hold.
The addition of US test certification will be useful in all our global markets, because of the increasing numbers of American architects working overseas, and therefore specifying US tested systems. This is the case particularly in the Middle East, where typical specifications for fire-resistant systems are often required to comply with US standards.
The systems successfully tested were our F1 door, screen and window system, which achieved 90 minutes positive pressure and temperature rise fire resistance; and our SR 60 curtain wall system that was tested to 60 minutes temperature rise. This, we believe, underlines the safety and versatility of Wrightstyle systems across the full range of both interior and exterior applications.
It does, however, seem strange that in a world where our systems are designed to withstand searing temperatures or the blast impact of a truck bomb, our successful pass came down to a stream of cold water.
Water torture it certainly was!